The AI Visibility Comparison Platform

Compare AI Visibility Tools, Agencies & Consultants

One trusted platform to discover, compare, and choose across the entire AI visibility industry - GEO tools, AEO platforms, agencies, consultants, digital PR, Reddit marketing, and audit software for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews.

  • Built for SaaS teams
  • Useful for agencies
  • Editorial rankings
  • Transparent methodology
  • AI-search focused
AI Answer Monitor — Live
prompt →"best ai visibility tools"
  1. 1. Profound
  2. 2. Evertune
  3. 3. Semrush AI Visibility
Your Brand — Mention ShareCompetitor Avg
The Shift

In AI search, inclusion replaces rank.

In an AI answer your brand is either mentioned or invisible — and a #1 Google ranking no longer guarantees you are in the answer at all. CompareNow.ai helps you close that gap: measure where you stand, earn the citations engines actually use, and choose the tool, agency, or consultant to get it done.

2026 — why now
Apr 28, 2026
Adobe completes its Semrush acquisition
Jun 3, 2026
Sitecore acquires Scrunch into SitecoreAI
Jun 3, 2026
Google adds generative-AI reports to Search Console
Trust

How we score — drawn to scale

Every ranking is editorial, computed from a published five-criterion rubric scored from source-linked research. No pay-for-position; affiliate links are disclosed.

39
solutions tracked
100%
claims source-linked
Read the methodology
Capability & maturity30%
AI engine coverage20%
Independent evidence20%
Pricing transparency15%
Best-for fit15%
The Playbook

The 4-step GEO playbook

Each step is governed by one piece of published research — and ends in the exact resource on this site that helps you run it.

1
Baseline
Measure where you actually stand — ranking is not inclusion.

31.8%of ChatGPT's cited domains overlap with Google's top ten (just 10% at the exact URL).

Ahrefs · 3,311 head terms
2
Earn citations
Get into the sources engines cite — mostly off your own site.

84%of AI-cited links are earned media; paid/advertorial is 0.3%. Your own site supplies only 4.3% of category-prompt citations.

Muck Rack (25M+ links) · Profound
3
Structure answer-first
Lead with the answer — the first turn is where you get cited.

12.6% → 4.5%citation incidence peaks at conversation turn 1 and decays by turn 10.

Profound · ~730k cited conversations
4
Measure
Re-run before you conclude — AI answers are noisy.

Identical prompts return different answers between runs — track trends over repeated runs, not single samples.

Ahrefs
The Data

Where AI engines actually get their answers

What you invest in to get cited — from the largest published studies of AI citations. Each figure names its source.

Where AI-cited links come from
Earned media
84%
Paid / advertorial
0.3%
Your own site*
4.3%
Earned vs paid: Muck Rack — 25M+ links across ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini (May 2026).
* Own-site share is a separate Profound study, measured on category-level prompts (27M citations).
Each engine reads a different web
ChatGPTWikipedia
ClaudePubMed Central
GeminiReddit
Top cited domain per engine — Muck Rack (May 2026)
91%
Perplexity cites a Google top-10 domain
Semrush
31.8%
ChatGPT overlap with Google (domain)
Ahrefs
Two different studies and engines — labelled separately, not one dataset.
Decide

Tool, agency, or consultant?

The deciding factor is simple: who will act on the work. Answer three questions for a recommended model, a real ranked shortlist, and the comparison that settles it.

1 · Your goal
2 · In-house capacity
3 · Budget
Choose if…
Recommended model
A GEO tool

You have execution capacity in-house — buy the data and run it yourself. From $29–295/mo self-serve.

Top-ranked shortlist
Explore

The editorial rankings

Scored on a published five-criterion rubric — the shortlist behind the engine.

Verified pricing spans $29/mo (Otterly Lite) to reported $2,000-5,000+/mo (Profound enterprise).A tool plus 5-10 in-house hours/week beats an agency retainer below ~$2,000/mo total spend; above that, compare against a specialist agency engagement.
See all AI Visibility Tools
Head-to-head

Popular Comparisons

Side-by-side breakdowns of the AI visibility solutions buyers ask about most.

All comparisons
Pr
Profound
VS
Peec AI logoPeec AI

At the entry level it is now a fair fight: Profound's $99 Starter tracks ChatGPT only, while Peec's $95 covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini with unlimited seats - Peec wins on breadth per dollar. Profound wins when you need its depth: Claude and 10-engine coverage, agent workflows, and enterprise analytics.

Choose Profound: Choose Profound if you need its analytics depth or multi-engine Enterprise coverage (up to 10 engines incl. Claude), or want to start small on the $99 ChatGPT-only Starter and grow into the platform.

Choose Peec AI: Choose Peec AI if you want three engines and unlimited seats at $95/month - broader entry coverage than Profound's ChatGPT-only Starter - plus agency workspaces from $245/month.

Full breakdown
Peec AI logoPeec AI
VS
Otterly AI logoOtterly AI

Otterly is the better value at the low end and the only one of the two with Google AI Overviews and Copilot in core plans. Peec is the better team tool - unlimited seats and agency workspaces - with a 4.9/5 G2 average (11 reviews) vs Otterly's 4.8/5 (52 reviews).

Choose Peec AI: Choose Peec AI if several people will live in the tool (unlimited seats), you run client accounts (agency plans from $245/month), and Gemini coverage matters more than AI Overviews.

Choose Otterly AI: Choose Otterly AI if you want the lowest real entry price ($29/month), Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot tracking, API/MCP integration, or built-in GEO URL audits - and are fine adding Gemini or Claude as paid add-ons.

Full breakdown
Pr
Profound
VS
Otterly AI logoOtterly AI

At equal budgets Otterly covers more engines: $29 buys four engines where Profound's $99 buys one. Choose Otterly for affordable multi-engine monitoring; choose Profound when its analytics depth matters or you are growing toward its Enterprise tier (up to 10 engines).

Choose Profound: Choose Profound if you value analytics depth and a growth path to Enterprise (Claude + 10 engines, API, SSO), or procurement wants the category's largest vendor ($96M Series C, Fortune-500-grade customers).

Choose Otterly AI: Choose Otterly AI if you want the most engine coverage per dollar at the low end ($29 buys 4 engines), a 7-day no-card trial, and integration hooks (API, MCP, Looker Studio).

Full breakdown

Frequently Asked Questions

>What is CompareNow.ai?

CompareNow.ai is a comparison and discovery platform for AI visibility, GEO, AEO, LLM SEO, and AI search optimization tools, agencies, and consultants.

>What is GEO?

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is the practice of optimizing brands and content to be cited and recommended inside AI answer engines like ChatGPT and Perplexity.

>How do you rank tools and agencies?

Every listing is scored with our published five-criterion rubric - AI engine coverage, capability, pricing transparency, independent evidence, and best-for fit - computed as a weighted total from source-linked research. See /methodology for the weights.

>How do I get listed?

Submit your company through the Submit Listing page. Editorial inclusion is free; sponsored placements are labeled.

>Which AI engines do you cover?

ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews.